Quantcast

Fear the Boot


It is currently Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:40 am

 Login 
Username:   Password:   Log me on automatically each visit  





This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 294 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 30  Next
 Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor 
Author Message
Online
Hussey Fluffer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 18260
Location: Sitting in Judgement from the Oval Office
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Freemage wrote:
Knaight wrote:
Freemage wrote:
That said, at least the first one you indicated, I'm a bit more tolerant of the "no padding" concept. Not necessarily no clothing underneath, just no padding of the sort you say should be there, for one simple reason--elf. That suggests a classic "mithril/elven mail" scenario, where the primary concern would be a slight bit of protection from chafing, which could be accounted for with simple cloth, and where the mail itself is about as thin and light as cloth.

Here's the thing. Even if that mail didn't break, getting stabbed could simply bury a bunch of metal links way under your skin, which is pretty much bad news.


I think we'll need to agree to disagree on this one. ;) Again, I'm allowing for a fantastic element, precisely because it's a definitely fantastic character. Note that the originator of the concept of mithril armor, Tolkien, had it worn by the Hobbits underneath their regular clothing, pretty much flush against the skin. This suggests that the normal issues simply do not apply. I'm more willing to be impressed by the fact, then, that the armor still covers all the vital points--arguably, it even covers the neck in a fashion that would be impossible with 'normal' armor.

Or it could just mean that Hobbits in general are a peaceful lot who know jack diddly shit about how to properly wear armor, and are lucky that mithril is super-fanta-magically strong or they'd have gotten screwed up by their own mail.

Just a thought.

_________________
Chad wrote:
Let me tell you some things I don't do: I don't do Women. - FtB, Ep88, 36:46
Chad wrote:
Oh my god, I love the Boys! FtB, Ep144, 35:05


PS. Fuck you Cafepress


Fri Aug 26, 2011 8:06 am
Profile WWW
Host
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2008 7:23 am
Posts: 8572
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Azhrei Vep wrote:
I hate


For you, isn't that redundant?

:D

_________________
jinx wrote:
"So yeah, Chris was right, you shut your whore mouths."


Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:22 am
Profile
Red Boba Fett
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 7:14 pm
Posts: 10318
Location: Loveland, CO
Post Re: Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Chris wrote:
Azhrei Vep wrote:
I hate


For you, isn't that redundant?

:D


QFT

_________________
Need an editor? Send me a PM. I do copyediting as well as more in-depth editing of fiction and creative nonfiction.


Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:16 am
Profile
ZCE's Grandmother's Quantum Cat
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:02 pm
Posts: 5651
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Azhrei Vep wrote:
Freemage wrote:
Knaight wrote:
Here's the thing. Even if that mail didn't break, getting stabbed could simply bury a bunch of metal links way under your skin, which is pretty much bad news.


I think we'll need to agree to disagree on this one. ;) Again, I'm allowing for a fantastic element, precisely because it's a definitely fantastic character. Note that the originator of the concept of mithril armor, Tolkien, had it worn by the Hobbits underneath their regular clothing, pretty much flush against the skin. This suggests that the normal issues simply do not apply. I'm more willing to be impressed by the fact, then, that the armor still covers all the vital points--arguably, it even covers the neck in a fashion that would be impossible with 'normal' armor.

Or it could just mean that Hobbits in general are a peaceful lot who know jack diddly shit about how to properly wear armor, and are lucky that mithril is super-fanta-magically strong or they'd have gotten screwed up by their own mail.

Just a thought.


I concur that the hobbits got lucky. However, that still makes them ~right~, when it comes to wearing mithril. Armor protects at the cost of speed and agility. Mail that can be worn like cloth, with no significant padding, would be a way of gaining that protection without the cost. It's worth noting that mithril, in D&D, is not merely lighter--armors made from it imbue fewer or no penalties on movement and agility. That would suggest that the "mail worn as cloth" concept is, in fact, how it should work.

In a group shot, the elf should be standing next to one of the better-portrayed humans from the list; the human wearing a padded suit of forged steel of the sort that Knaight was advocating, the elf wearing the mithril mail.

_________________
You say "wankery" like it's a bad thing.


Fri Aug 26, 2011 10:18 am
Profile
( 1. Numbered List ( 2. Dan ) 3. Venn Diagram )
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:15 pm
Posts: 4273
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Freemage wrote:
Armor protects at the cost of speed and agility. Mail that can be worn like cloth, with no significant padding, would be a way of gaining that protection without the cost. It's worth noting that mithril, in D&D, is not merely lighter--armors made from it imbue fewer or no penalties on movement and agility. That would suggest that the "mail worn as cloth" concept is, in fact, how it should work.

In a group shot, the elf should be standing next to one of the better-portrayed humans from the list; the human wearing a padded suit of forged steel of the sort that Knaight was advocating, the elf wearing the mithril mail.

You really don't lose that much speed or agility. Full plate won't prevent you from doing cartwheels, and properly fitted armor basically doesn't restrict movement. I'm not saying you lose no agility or speed, but the amount is pretty trivial, and unless you need to climb or swim frequently armor is basically always a good idea.

_________________
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." George Bernard Shaw


Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:32 pm
Profile
The Baron's Body Double
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 10:45 pm
Posts: 3488
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Of course, none of that has anything to do with the meaning of "reasonable" in the context of the blog, since the blog is about armored women who look badass instead of cheesecakey. It's not anti-stylization.

Especially when the baseline for comparison is closer to this

_________________
There are a lot of things I'm not saying. Those things I'm not saying? I'm not saying them.


Fri Aug 26, 2011 12:57 pm
Profile
Myopic Sycophant
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 13, 2008 4:09 pm
Posts: 2608
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Freemage wrote:
Armor protects at the cost of speed and agility. Mail that can be worn like cloth, with no significant padding, would be a way of gaining that protection without the cost. It's worth noting that mithril, in D&D, is not merely lighter--armors made from it imbue fewer or no penalties on movement and agility. That would suggest that the "mail worn as cloth" concept is, in fact, how it should work.


Armor works by reducing the concentration of impact to manageable levels. Two techniques are deflection and dispersion. Plate armors, and some of the scale armors use deflection. Blows hit the armor at weird angles and most of the energy gets deflected away. Chainmail uses dispersion. It intercepts a concentrated blow, like from a sword, and spreads the blow over a larger area. That is where the padding comes in (never mind the chaffing). Without padding to displace the energy, elven chain offers very little protection. I would even say NONE vs. bludgeoning attacks.


Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:09 pm
Profile
( 1. Numbered List ( 2. Dan ) 3. Venn Diagram )
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:15 pm
Posts: 4273
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Viletta Vadim wrote:
Especially when the baseline for comparison is closer to this

Huh. I'm trying to figure out whether the armor, the shield, or the spear is the dumbest of the lot, and it is proving difficult. That said, that is significantly worse than normal, and its the typical which should be used as a baseline for comparison. Still, that is somewhat closer than any of the pictures on the tumblr, which is sad and pathetic.

Citizen Joe wrote:
Freemage wrote:
Armor protects at the cost of speed and agility. Mail that can be worn like cloth, with no significant padding, would be a way of gaining that protection without the cost. It's worth noting that mithril, in D&D, is not merely lighter--armors made from it imbue fewer or no penalties on movement and agility. That would suggest that the "mail worn as cloth" concept is, in fact, how it should work.


Armor works by reducing the concentration of impact to manageable levels. Two techniques are deflection and dispersion. Plate armors, and some of the scale armors use deflection. Blows hit the armor at weird angles and most of the energy gets deflected away. Chainmail uses dispersion. It intercepts a concentrated blow, like from a sword, and spreads the blow over a larger area. That is where the padding comes in (never mind the chaffing). Without padding to displace the energy, elven chain offers very little protection. I would even say NONE vs. bludgeoning attacks.

Exactly. Unless it stiffens when hit and a large area is suddenly basically a solid plate that won't bend in, the mail is nigh useless. The fact that it is flexible means that padding is necessary.

_________________
"The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it." George Bernard Shaw


Fri Aug 26, 2011 1:13 pm
Profile
Teller of gaming stories
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 7:04 pm
Posts: 912
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
It's not like fantasy, it's not like conservation of momentum applies anywhere else. Ergo if your metal is fantasy special enough, you don't need padding.

_________________
Something here doesn't make sense. Let's go poke it with a stick.
-The Doctor


Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:28 pm
Profile
The Baron's Body Double
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2008 10:45 pm
Posts: 3488
Post Re: Women Fighters in Reasonable Armor
Knaight wrote:
Huh. I'm trying to figure out whether the armor, the shield, or the spear is the dumbest of the lot, and it is proving difficult. That said, that is significantly worse than normal, and its the typical which should be used as a baseline for comparison. Still, that is somewhat closer than any of the pictures on the tumblr, which is sad and pathetic.

Unfortunately, it isn't any worse than normal. The default for women in armor is the steel lingerie, the battle corset, the boob-windowed skin-tight thing paired with metal stripper boots. If you want worse than normal, you're getting into the realm of the "pasties and a cork" school of design. Or something like this.

_________________
There are a lot of things I'm not saying. Those things I'm not saying? I'm not saying them.


Fri Aug 26, 2011 2:45 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.   [ 294 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 30  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.